The Best Defence Is A Good Offence: Gilead Invalidates Patent Threatening its SOVALDI Product

On November 2, 2015 Justice Annis released a 326-page decision holding that Canadian Patent No. 2,490,191 is invalid (2015 FC 1156). Gilead sells the antiviral drug sofosbuvir in Canada under the brand name Sovaldi, for use in combatting Hepatitis C virus (HCV). Gilead commenced an action to impeach the 191 Patent because the manufacture, use...
Read More

Post-filing Amendments are Subject to Data Protection

In Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. The Minister of Health, Attorney General of Canada and Sanofi-aventis Canada Inc., Hospira was unsuccessful in its application for judicial review of a decision of the Minister refusing to issue a Notice of Compliance for its OXALIPLATIN FOR INJECTION product due the application of the data protection provisions of the...
Read More

Stand on ENVIRO-GUARD; Tiger’s trade-mark opposition denied

In Tiger Calcium Services Inc. v. Compass Minerals Canada Corp., 2015 FC 1257, Justice McDonald upheld the TMOB’s decision to reject Tiger’s opposition to the registration of the trade‑mark ENVIRO‑GUARD, owned by Compass (formerly Sifto Canada). At issue was whether the ENVIRO‑GUARD mark was confusing with the marks CLEAR GUARD, ROAD GUARD PLUS, and NANUK...
Read More

Time for a Change – Federal Court Confirms that it can Amend the Inventorship and Ownership of a Patent after it is Issued

On October 28, 2015 Justice LeBlanc released his judgment and reasons in Imperial Oil Resources Ltd. v. ExxonMobil Upstream, 2015 FC 1218, an application by Imperial and Upstream under section 52 of the Patent Act, for an order to vary the inventorship and ownership of Canadian Patent 2,740,481. The 481 Patent named 11 co-inventors and...
Read More

ABSOLUTE marks confuse absolutely

Absolute Software Corporation has operated under the trade-name ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE since 1993 and used its name as a common law mark. Since that time, it registered the following trade-marks in association with its software and services, including ABSOLUTE, and ABSOLUTE SECURE DRIVE. In November 2012, Valt.X, a start-up company that produces software that protects computers...
Read More

Do ask, still don’t get – $2000 awarded on Bill of Costs seeking more than $400,000

Teva Canada Limited and Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc have duelled over Teva’s generic ramipril product in various proceedings, including an NOC proceeding, an infringement action, and a counterclaim for s. 8 damages. Teva was successful in each of these proceedings. In Teva’s counterclaim for s. 8 damages, Teva alleged that Sanofi Germany exerted a degree of...
Read More

BCFIT Trade-Mark Infringed and Passed Off, with a Side of Defamation

In British Columbia Recreation and Parks Association v. Zakharia [2015] BCSC 1650, Justice Funt of the British Columbia Supreme Court found the Defendants, John Zakharia and Jane Doe, liable for defamation, passing off, trademark infringement, injurious falsehood, breach of the Competition Act and conspiracy to injure. In addition to injunctive relief, Justice Funt awarded the...
Read More

Unanswered Questions – Bard Successfully Avoids Answering Questions on Discovery

On October 16, 2015, Justice LeBlanc dismissed an appeal by W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. and W.L. Gore & Associates Canada Inc.  from an order of Prothonotary Morneau who had denied Gore’s request for certain answers to questions posed during discovery. In this action the Plaintiffs, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Bard Canada Inc.  have...
Read More

Pay the wall – circumventing paywalls is copyright infringement

In 1395804 Ontario Limited (Blacklock’s Reporter) v. Canadian Vintners Association, 2015 CanLII 65885, Deputy Judge Lyon Gilbert of the Ottawa Small Claims Court found that the Defendants breached the Plaintiffs copyright by using a third party to circumvent the Plaintiff’s paywall. The Plaintiff was an electronic daily that provides news for subscription-only users.  Commonly, the...
Read More

An Appeal is Mooted after Contested Trade-mark Application is Withdrawn

Engineers Canada, a national federation of provincial and territorial associations of professional engineers had its appeal of a decision of the Trade-marks Opposition Board rejecting its opposition to the mark POLARTEC ECO-ENGINEERING DESIGN by MMI-ICO LLC as moot. Engineers Canada opposed the mark pursuant to the Trade-marks Act, on the basis that MMI-ICO, which deals...
Read More

Fight Over Factums: Ontario Divisional Court Grants Leave to Appeal From Decision Refusing to Approve a Class Action Settlement

In Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, 2015 ONSC 3843, Justice Swinton of the Ontario Divisional Court granted leave to appeal an order of Justice Perell, who had refused to approve a settlement of the proceeding/class counsel fees in the class action that was at issue in this proceeding. The case involved a certified class...
Read More

Pot-shots from the sidelines not enough to disprove inherent anticipation

On June 15, 2015, Justice Barnes released his public Judgment and Reasons in a prohibition application involving Mylan and Canadian Patent No. 2,341,031 listed on the Patent Register against Takeda’s pantoprazole product, TECTA. The 031 Patent is generally directed to pantoprazole magnesium dihydrate. Mylan raised a number of invalidity allegations, but the case ultimately turned...
Read More

No one is higher than the law – Headshop trade-mark infringer jailed for contempt

Hightimes Smoke Shop and Gifts, a headshop located in Niagara Falls, was previously ordered to pay $55,000 in damages and costs relating to trade-mark infringement and passing off regarding Trans-High’s registered trade-mark, HIGH TIMES. Hightimes was also permanently enjoined from selling, distributing or advertising any goods or services in association the HIGH TIMES mark. Despite...
Read More

Inherent Distinctiveness Must Consider Potential Uses Of Marks, Not Merely Their Actual Uses

Constellation Brands Inc. and related companies appealed a decision of the Trade-Marks Opposition Board that rejected Constellation’s opposition under s. 38 of the Trade-marks Act. Constellation had opposed Domains Pinnacle Inc.’s attempt to register a trade-mark for in association with apple based alcoholic beverages and non-alcoholic apple based products such as sparkling and not sparkling...
Read More

A Sheep In Wolf’s Clothing – Alleged Errors of Fact Should Not Be Dressed Up As Errors Of Law

The Federal Court of Appeal recently considered two competing appeals regarding patents listed on the Patent Register against Alcon’s moxifloxacin product, VIGAMOX. In the Application below, Justice Phelan dealt with three patents and held that Actavis’ allegation of obviousness in respect of Canadian Patent No. 2,342,211 was justified, whereas its allegations in respect of Canadian Patent No. 1,340,114 and 2,192,418 were...
Read More

Cleaning Up the Waste: Federal Court Invalidates Patent for Treating Waste Material from Mining Operations

On August 24, 2015, Justice Phelan held that Canadian Patent No. 2,515,581 is invalid for obviousness (2015 FC 997). This action involved only a challenge to the validity of the 581 Patent by SNF as CIBA’s counterclaim for infringement was settled during the course of the trial. The 581 Patent is generally directed to a...
Read More

Absent Special Circumstances, Interlocutory Trademark Decision Not Subject To Judicial Review

McDowell applied for judicial review of an interlocutory decision of the Trade-Marks Opposition Board that had refused to grant McDowell leave to amend its Statement of Opposition to add a ground of opposition that was inadvertently omitted. The amendment was sought 4 years after its Statement of Opposition, and after Automatic Princess had filed its...
Read More