Anticipated Appeals Cannot Be United
In Cooperstock v. United Airlines, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that an appeal can be stayed or consolidated with related appeals... Read More
You Can’t Lose What You Never Had: Government Can’t Expropriate Unencumbered Seismic Data Copyright That Never Existed
In Geophysical Service Inc. v. The Queen, Prothonotary Tabib of the Federal Court struck GSI’s Statement of claim. In doing so, Prothonotary... Read More
Inventive Concept Redux: Shire’s ADHD Prodrug Patent Upheld By Federal Court
In a decision released publicly on June 21, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Apotex’s action against Shire seeking a declaration of invalidity... Read More
Federal Court Sets Aside B-side Trademark for Beau’s Beer
In Steelbird Ghetto Properties LLC v. Beau’s All Natural Brewing Company Ltd, Steelbird Ghetto Properties LLC sought an Order striking the trademark... Read More
Supreme Court of Canada Refuses to Hear Mining Patent Obviousness Appeal
On June 14, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Ciba’s application for leave to appeal the decision of the Federal Court... Read More
Death of the Protective Order in the Federal Court of Canada?
Seedlings Life Science Ventures LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443 is the second decision (following Live Face on Web, LLC... Read More
Bauer Hockey Helmets Avoid Infringement Injury
On May 7, 2018 the Federal Court granted MIPS action in part, findings its patent valid but not infringed by Bauer’s RE-AKT... Read More
Problem Gaming Patent Lacks Scintilla Of Utility
On May 25th, 2018 the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in Safe Gaming System Inc v. Atlantic Lottery Corporation involving... Read More
For Your (and In-House Counsel’s) Eyes Only: Court Clarifies Scope Of “Counsel’s Eyes Only” Disclosure Designation
In Angelcare v Munchkin, Justice Roussel of the Federal Court affirmed a decision allowing in-house counsel to access the “Counsel’s Eyes Only”... Read More
Pipefill sales recoverable under section 8 – Federal Court of Appeal
In its judgment dated February 22, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Eli Lilly’s appeal from the judgment of Justice O’Reilly... Read More
Formalities for Confidentiality Orders Not Required for Trial Materials
On March 29, 2018 the Federal Court dismissed MediaTube’s motion challenging the confidentiality designations made by Bell Canada during and following the... Read More
Federal Court Holds Apotex Could Have But Would Not Have Used Non-Infringing Alternative
Apotex was held liable in 2008 for infringing ADIR’s patent by selling perindopril tables made in Canada to affiliates in the UK... Read More
Trademark Rights Sufficient To Support Restraint of Trade
The recent decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal in Mars Canada Inc. v. Bemco Cash & Carry upheld a settlement agreement... Read More
Federal Court Holds Biologic Patent Valid and Infringed
In the first patent action involving biosimilars, the Federal Court held that the patent was valid and infringed. The Kennedy Trust for... Read More
Circumstances Not Sufficiently Special To Allow Pleading Amendment
On February 6, 2018, Justice Dunphy dismissed Sanofi’s motion for leave to amend their statement of defence in light of “special circumstances”,... Read More
Apo-Esomeprazole Section 8 Action Dismissed Due to Infringement
Apotex Inc. v. AstraZeneca Canada Inc, is the Federal Court’s decision regarding Apotex’s section 8 action, and AstraZeneca’s related infringement action, in relation... Read More
Patent Infringers Cannot Elect Patentee’s Remedy
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’ appeal from a decision in which Apotex sought to elect the remedy that Bayer was... Read More
Court Dismisses Career College Copyright Case As Time Barred
In 907687 Ontario Inc. (c.o.b. International Institute of Travel) v. Shokour, 2017 FC 969, the Federal Court found that the plaintiff did... Read More
Court of Appeal Clarifies Costs Framework in Copyright Class Action
On November 15, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal issued its Reasons for Judgment in an appeal from an order that (1)... Read More
Shilajit Inventor Has No Rights To Assert After Patent Assignment
In Rowland v. Stephen, Justice Petersen struck Mr. Rowland’s statement of claim and denied his leave to amend on the basis that... Read More
First Use, Not Registration, Confers Exclusive Right To A Trade-mark
On November 2, 2017, Justice Roussel allowed Micro Matic’s application under section 57 of the Trade-marks Act and struck Taizhou’s trade-mark registration for... Read More
Court of Appeal Jettisons Uncertain “Inventive Concept” in Obviousness Analysis
The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in the appeal from the successful patent impeachment action by SNF challenging the validity... Read More
Entirety Of The Patent Must Be Considered When Determining If A Patent Pertains To A Medicine
Galderma had two patents for Differin which contained 0.1% adapalene (Canadian patent nos. 1,266,646 and 1,312,075 (expired 2007 and 2009, respectively). In... Read More
“Overpromising” following Esomeprazole SCC
In this decision, Justice Manson was called upon to decide whether certain amendments Apotex sought to make to its pleadings ought to... Read More
No Cookies For You! – Federal Court Confirms Jurisdiction to Issue Split Decisions in Trade-mark Oppositions
In Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, Metro appealed a Trade-marks Opposition Board decision... Read More