Vacuum Wars and Trademark Troubles: VPC Fails to Obtain Interlocutory Injunction
In 2572495 Ontario Inc. v. Vacuum Specialists (1985) Ltd., Justice Pentney of the Federal Court dismissed a motion for an interlocutory injunction... Read More
Enough (evidence) is enough: Redactions to invoices no barrier to lump sum costs award
In Eli Lilly v Apotex, Justice St-Louis awarded Apotex its costs in a patent action involving the drug tadalafil and three patents... Read More
Norwich Orders are not a Second Stab at Discovery
In the context of Worthware’s action against Raysoft for inducing patent infringement, Worthware brought a motion for a Norwich Order under Rules... Read More
It’s all About Construction
Valeant’s Canadian Patent No. 2,524,300 claims a modified-release bupropion tablet with three parts: a core comprising the active ingredient and various excipients;... Read More
Inventive Concept Redux: Shire’s ADHD Prodrug Patent Upheld By Federal Court
In a decision released publicly on June 21, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Apotex’s action against Shire seeking a declaration of invalidity... Read More
Patent Term Extension Comes to Canada
As part of its obligations under the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement which came into force on September 21, 2017,... Read More
Why Get An Injunction Anywhere Else? – Federal Court Grants Rare Interlocutory Injunction In Trademark Dispute
On February 9, 2017, the Federal Court granted a motion brought by Sleep Country Canada Inc. for an interlocutory injunction preventing Sears... Read More